What if the change you're looking for isn't something I do to you but something your body already knows how to do?
That's the question at the centre of my work, and it's the question this research programme exists to document properly.
Why I'm Researching My Own Work
People come to me carrying things that haven't shifted anywhere else
 pain that's outlasted physio, treatment, and time; anxiety or old trauma that logic alone hasn't touched; a body that's stopped trusting itself. In session after session, and in the training room, I kept watching something change.
So in 2026 I launched the Autosomatic Resolution Programme (ARP)Â a formal, pre-registered research programme that documents outcomes from these sessions with the same rigour used in mainstream pain and trauma research. Every session that's part of this programme is measured before and after, followed up months later, and in some cases independently verified by a physiotherapist or consultant who has no stake in the outcome.
This isn't a testimonial page. It's a record of what's actually being tracked, and an open invitation to be part of it.
before data
collection
What A Session Can Do
Working with the body's own imagination, in a calm and safe state.
Chronic pain & old injuries
Restricted movement, tension held for years in a shoulder, a back, a gut.
Anxiety, grief & trauma
The kind of stuck patterns that talking alone hasn't resolved.
People I've worked with describe things like:
"The pain I'd had in my shoulder for three years the one two physios and a scan couldn't shift felt completely different by the end of the session."
"I went in braced for a conversation about my knee and came out able to move it in a way I hadn't in months."
"I didn't expect anything to happen and then I was crying, and then I wasn't anxious about it anymore."
These are the kinds of shifts I've watched happen, repeatedly, which is exactly why I built a formal programme to track them properly rather than just collecting stories. I'm not going to tell you this will resolve your ailment nobody honest can promise that, for anyone, before they've met you. What I can tell you is that this is what I see often enough that I've staked my professional reputation on measuring it in the open, in public, with independent people watching.
If you've been carrying something that hasn't shifted anywhere else, this may be worth an hour of your time to find out.
The Evidence Standard
Why this isn't just another wellness claim.
Anyone can say a therapy "works." Here's what makes this different:
Pre-registered on OSF
Registered on the Open Science Framework before a single data point was collected the questions, methods, and analysis plan are timestamped and public, not written after the fact to fit the results.
Independent clinical observers
A physiotherapist and an orthopaedic consultant, unaffiliated with the programme and unpaid for their statements, watch sessions and file their own independent written assessments.
Validated measurement tools
VAS, SUD, and PSFS scales, the same scales used in published pain and trauma research, recorded before and after every session and again at 1, 6, and 12 months.
A public commitment to publish everything
Positive, null, or disappointing. Nothing gets buried because the numbers are inconvenient.
A dedicated protocol for surgical cases
Used where surgery was recommended and later confirmed, in writing, by the referring clinician, as no longer required.
This is the standard I'm holding myself to. Most practitioners never open their outcomes to this level of scrutiny. I want mine examined.
Two Ways To Be Part Of It
Book a 1:1 session
You'll be offered the chance to have your outcome anonymised, under your own chosen code included in the dataset. It's entirely optional and has no bearing on your session either way.
Book a 1:1 sessionTrain with me
SomaGenics advanced practitioner training runs several times a year. Outcomes that happen in the training room, witnessed by other participants, are part of this same research with your consent, and never in a way that identifies you.
Ask about trainingEither way, your involvement helps build something bigger than one session: a published, peer-reviewable body of evidence for an approach I believe deserves to be taken seriously.
What Participation Actually Involves
Nothing changes about your session
The only difference is a couple of minutes recording a before-and-after score.
Optional follow-up
A check-in at 1, 6, and 12 months. Your name never enters the dataset you choose your own anonymous code.
Withdraw at any point
No questions asked.
Where This Is Heading
A published, peer-reviewable body of evidence.
The dataset is offered to independent researchers once it reaches 50 documented sessions across at least 10 participants, with further milestones at 100 and 150–200 sessions aimed at peer-reviewed publication. Every milestone will be published here and on the OSF registration.
Ready To Find Out For Yourself?
An hour of your time, measured properly.
Book a session, ask about training, or read the full research protocol before you decide.
